Signal Design Gallery

All 29 signals × 87 variants — reference for design review.

Design review reference

This page renders every signal in xGoal via the real production SignalCard and the detail component registered in frontend/components/insight/signals/index.ts. Use it as a single reference when reviewing visual design — no clicking required, every detail view is rendered alongside its card.

1. Integrated insight (production layout)

Real InsightDisplay rendered with a mock MatchInsight that contains one signal per registered category. This shows the production stacking order, spacing, and card chrome that reviewers should compare individual signal variants against.

Atlantic Premier League • Mock

NBU

Northbridge United

Home

CPT

Castlepoint FC

Away

Sunday, 17 May 2026•2026-05-17 21:45 CEST

Northbridge Arena

Sunday, 17 May 2026

•

2026-05-17 21:45 CEST

•

Northbridge Arena

Match Balance

Probabilities

High 7/7

Probability Ranges

High Confidence 7/7

Match Balance

NBU53%Draw25%CPT22%

NBU

48–56%

Draw

22–28%

CPT

18–26%

Strong Edge

NBU Win

48–56%

Draw

22–28%

CPT Win

18–26%

Northbridge United to Win

xGoal Model

52%

Gap

+7%

Market

45%

Confidence

7/7

Odds moved toward your pick

Odds drifted 5.5% over 2d (2.35 → 2.22).

Best Odds

2.22 @ MockBook

Find on MockBook →

Key Influencing Signals

Offense

Attacking threat and chance creation

Chance Quality (xG)

Very high

NBU creating better chances.

NBU
2.34 xG Many quality chances

CPT
1.18 xG Average output

2 seasons

H2H Offensive also favors NBU

Territorial Control

Very high

NBU have been dominating possession.

NBUPoss62%
·DA64.8
·Pass88%
High control

CPTPoss46%
·DA41.2
·Pass81%
Limited

2 seasons

H2H Tactical also favors NBU

Possession Efficiency

Very high

NBU are efficient with possession.

NBUEPV3.9
·Shot36%
·Pass88%
Below Avg

CPTEPV2.7
·Shot27%
·Pass80%
Inefficient

2 seasons

H2H Tactical also favors NBU

Set Piece Threat

Very high

NBU converts a higher share of set-piece chances.

NBUThr58%
·Cor6.4
·Aer58%
Effective

CPTThr41%
·Cor4.7
·Aer48%
Average

2 seasons

H2H Offensive also favors NBU

Aerial Dominance

Very high

NBU have a significant aerial duel advantage.

NBUWin61%
·Aerials22.6
Dominant

CPTWin47%
·Aerials18.4
Average

2 seasons

Crossing Quality

Very high

NBU delivers crosses with higher accuracy.

NBUAcc28%
·Crosses19.8
Good

CPTAcc21%
·Crosses15.4
Average

2 seasons

H2H Offensive also favors NBU

Creativity

Very high

NBU produces more key passes and big chances created per match.

NBUKP12.4
·BC3.5
·Ast1.8
Elite creation

CPTKP8.1
·BC1.6
·Ast0.9
Strong creativity

1 seasoncurrent season only

H2H Offensive also favors NBU

Conversion Efficiency

Very high

CPT converts above expected goals across the recent sample.

1 seasoncurrent season only

H2H Offensive diverges — favors NBU instead

Counter Attack Threat

Very high

CPT converts more of its dangerous transitions per match.

NBU2.4/m

counters

3.1/m CPT

2 seasons

H2H Offensive diverges — favors NBU instead

Defense

Defensive solidity and prevention

Pressing Intensity

Very high

NBU presses higher and disrupts build-up earlier than CPT.

NBU92%

73%CPT

Mixed pressing approaches - expect an unpredictable tactical contest

2 seasons

H2H Tactical also favors NBU

GK Shot-Stopping

Very high

NBU GK is in strong form.

NBU+7.4 GSAx Elite shot-stopper

CPT-2.6 GSAx Below expected

1 seasoncurrent season only

H2H Defensive also favors NBU

Defensive Reliability

Very high

NBU concedes fewer high-quality chances per match.

NBUxGA1.05
·CS39%
Solid

CPTxGA1.62
·CS18%
Average

2 seasons

H2H Defensive also favors NBU

Tackle Efficiency

Very high

NBU wins a higher share of attempted tackles.

NBUSuccess69%
·Tackles14.2
Strong

CPTSuccess60%
·Tackles11.4
Average

1 seasoncurrent season only

H2H Defensive also favors NBU

Aerial Defense

Very high

CPT excel in aerial defense.

NBULoss49%
·Losses9.6
Average

CPTLoss33%
·Losses5.8
Dominant

2 seasons

Defensive Discipline

Very high

CPT more disciplined than opponent.

NBUIndis62%
·Fouls11.4
Average

CPTIndis38%
·Fouls9.1
Average

2 seasons

H2H Defensive diverges — favors NBU instead

Discipline Risk

Very high

Discipline slightly favors NBU.

NBUCards1.9
·Fouls11.5
Moderate

CPTCards2.2
·Fouls12.4
Moderate

1 seasoncurrent season only

Context

Match circumstances and history

Recent Form

Very high

NBU carries stronger recent momentum than CPT.

1 seasoncurrent season only

H2H Record also favors NBU

Home Advantage

Very high

Venue indicates strong NBU advantage.

NBU

71%home wins

Fortress home

CPTVisiting

2 seasons

Fixture Congestion

Very high

CPT faces a tighter midweek-to-kickoff turnaround than NBU.

NBU
 7 daysExtended rest

CPT
 3 daysShort rest

1 seasoncurrent season only

League Position

Very high

League position indicates significant NBU advantage

3rd

NBU

64 pts · 1.94 PPG

european

9places

12th

CPT

38 pts · 1.15 PPG

mid table

1 seasoncurrent season only

H2H Record also favors NBU

Manager Effect

Very high

NBU's manager is past the new-manager-bounce window with steady PPG.

H2H Record

Very high

NBU carries the better head-to-head record across recent meetings.

1.8

goals/match

NBU

1.75 PPG

4-2-2W-D-L8 meetings

1.1

goals/match

CPT

1.00 PPG

8 meetings

H2H Tactical

Very high

NBU has dominated possession in recent head-to-heads.

60.0%

possession

NBU

49.0 DA/match

vs6 matches

40.0%

possession

CPT

30.0 DA/match

H2H Offensive

Very high

NBU generates more chance volume in head-to-heads.

H2H Defensive

Very high

NBU has conceded fewer high-quality chances in head-to-heads.

1.05

xGA/match

NBU

38% clean sheets

vs8 meetings

1.70

xGA/match

CPT

13% clean sheets

Squad Availability

Very high

NBU carries a heavier injury impact than CPT.

NBU +1
4 out DEF:1MID:2FWD:1
1.42Crisis

CPT
2 out DEF:1MID:1
0.35Weakened

1 seasoncurrent season only

Weather Impact

Very high

Forecast conditions are neutral for both squads.

clear

18°C·6 km/h

1 / 100

NBU

adaptation

1 / 100

CPT

adaptation

1 seasoncurrent season only

Referee Profile

Very high

The appointed referee carries a card-tolerant profile in recent matches.

NBUFriction0
·Record+0%
·Cards4.0

CPTFriction0
·Record+0%
·Cards5.0

2 seasons

H2H Physical

Very high

Recent head-to-heads register elevated foul and card volume on both sides.

NBUAerials1%
·Fouls14.5
·Cards2.6

CPTAerials1%
·Fouls13.8
·Cards2.4

20 signals favor Northbridge United

5 signals favor Castlepoint FC

4 neutral signals

Most influential signal: NBU carries stronger recent momentum than CPT. (Recent Form, Favors Northbridge United)
2nd most influential: NBU presses higher and disrupts build-up earlier than CPT. (Pressing Intensity, Favors Northbridge United)
3rd most influential: NBU creating better chances. (Chance Quality (xG), Favors Northbridge United)
4th most influential: NBU have been dominating possession. (Territorial Control, Favors Northbridge United)
5th most influential: NBU are efficient with possession. (Possession Efficiency, Favors Northbridge United)
6th most influential: NBU carries a heavier injury impact than CPT. (Squad Availability, Favors Castlepoint FC)
7th most influential: Venue indicates strong NBU advantage. (Home Advantage, Favors Northbridge United)
8th most influential: CPT faces a tighter midweek-to-kickoff turnaround than NBU. (Fixture Congestion, Favors Northbridge United)
9th most influential: NBU GK is in strong form. (GK Shot-Stopping, Favors Northbridge United)
10th most influential: NBU concedes fewer high-quality chances per match. (Defensive Reliability, Favors Northbridge United)
11th most influential: NBU converts a higher share of set-piece chances. (Set Piece Threat, Favors Northbridge United)
12th most influential: CPT converts above expected goals across the recent sample. (Conversion Efficiency, Favors Castlepoint FC)
13th most influential: League position indicates significant NBU advantage (League Position, Favors Northbridge United)
14th most influential: NBU have a significant aerial duel advantage. (Aerial Dominance, Favors Northbridge United)
15th most influential: CPT converts more of its dangerous transitions per match. (Counter Attack Threat, Favors Castlepoint FC)
16th most influential: NBU delivers crosses with higher accuracy. (Crossing Quality, Favors Northbridge United)
17th most influential: NBU produces more key passes and big chances created per match. (Creativity, Favors Northbridge United)
19th most influential: NBU wins a higher share of attempted tackles. (Tackle Efficiency, Favors Northbridge United)
20th most influential: CPT excel in aerial defense. (Aerial Defense, Favors Castlepoint FC)
21th most influential: CPT more disciplined than opponent. (Defensive Discipline, Favors Castlepoint FC)
22th most influential: Discipline slightly favors NBU. (Discipline Risk, Neutral signal)
23th most influential: NBU's manager is past the new-manager-bounce window with steady PPG. (Manager Effect, Favors Northbridge United)
24th most influential: Forecast conditions are neutral for both squads. (Weather Impact, Neutral signal)
25th most influential: The appointed referee carries a card-tolerant profile in recent matches. (Referee Profile, Neutral signal)
26th most influential: NBU carries the better head-to-head record across recent meetings. (H2H Record, Favors Northbridge United)
27th most influential: NBU has dominated possession in recent head-to-heads. (H2H Tactical, Favors Northbridge United)
28th most influential: NBU generates more chance volume in head-to-heads. (H2H Offensive, Favors Northbridge United)
29th most influential: NBU has conceded fewer high-quality chances in head-to-heads. (H2H Defensive, Favors Northbridge United)
30th most influential: Recent head-to-heads register elevated foul and card volume on both sides. (H2H Physical, Neutral signal)

Data Transparency

High Confidence

7/7

All data fresh

Last updated 142d ago

High Confidence

142d ago

7/7

•Model and market agree on the leading outcome.

•All signal inputs are within freshness thresholds.

No Clear Advantage

No meaningful difference between teams

Discipline Risk

One signal was excluded for similar-performance between the two squads.

Learn how insights are calculated

2. Signal gallery

One subsection per registered signal, in registry order. Each card is rendered via the real SignalCard with its registered detail component rendered immediately below (the production card starts collapsed, so the detail view is duplicated here to keep the design reviewer's eye on the full visual surface).

Recent Form

formcontextFormDetailView

Strong · home · fresh

Recent Form

Very high

NBU carries dominant recent momentum.

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (FormDetailView)

Recent Form

NBU

Dominant momentum

W › W › W › W › W

oldest → newest

CPT

Declining form

L › D › W › L › L

oldest → newest

Scoring Trends

Goals Scored

12vs4

Goals Conceded

2vs8

Total goals from last 5 matches.

Venue Form

NBU

Home

3W·0D·0L

Away

2W·0D·0L

CPT

Home

1W·1D·0L

Away

0W·0D·3L

Form split by venue from recent matches.

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Form impact scale

Strong momentumNBU

Building momentum

Mixed results

Losing momentum

Recent matches weighted higher.

Moderate · away · fresh

Recent Form

Very high

CPT carries the better recent run.

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (FormDetailView)

Recent Form

NBU

Mixed results

L › D › L › D › W

oldest → newest

CPT

Building momentum

W › L › D › W › W

oldest → newest

Scoring Trends

Goals Scored

5vs8

Goals Conceded

6vs4

Total goals from last 5 matches.

Venue Form

NBU

Home

1W·1D·1L

Away

0W·1D·1L

CPT

Home

2W·0D·0L

Away

1W·1D·1L

Form split by venue from recent matches.

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Form impact scale

Strong momentum

Building momentumCPT

Mixed results

Losing momentum

Recent matches weighted higher.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Recent Form

Very high

Both squads show similar recent results — data is older than usual.

Recent results data is older than the usual freshness window.

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (FormDetailView)

Recent Form

NBU

Mixed results

W › L › D › L › W

oldest → newest

CPT

Mixed results

D › W › L › D › W

oldest → newest

Scoring Trends

Goals Conceded

6vs5

Goals Scored

6vs6

Total goals from last 5 matches.

Venue Form

NBU

Home

1W·1D·1L

Away

1W·0D·1L

CPT

Home

1W·1D·0L

Away

1W·1D·1L

Form split by venue from recent matches.

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Form impact scale

Strong momentum

Building momentum

Mixed results

Losing momentum

Recent matches weighted higher.

Pressing Intensity

pressing_intensitydefensePressingIntensityDetailView

Strong · home · fresh

Pressing Intensity

Very high

NBU presses noticeably higher than CPT.

NBU93%

70%CPT

Mixed pressing approaches - expect an unpredictable tactical contest

2 seasons

Detail view (PressingIntensityDetailView)

Match Dynamic: TACTICAL BATTLE

Mixed pressing approaches create an unpredictable contest.

PPDA

7.4vs14.1

DAR

0.0% vs0.0%

Northbridge United

Passive93%Aggressive

Based on 0 matches

ATK

MID

DEF

Unknown

Insufficient data to classify pressing approach.

Castlepoint FC

Passive70%Aggressive

Based on 0 matches

ATK

MID

DEF

Unknown

Insufficient data to classify pressing approach.

Stats based on fewer than 10 matches may be less reliable.

Pressing intensity scale

Elite press<8 PPDANBU

Strong press8-12 PPDA

Mid block12-16 PPDA

Passive≥16 PPDA

Moderate · away · fresh

Pressing Intensity

Very high

CPT engages the press marginally higher up the pitch.

NBU81%

90%CPT

Mixed pressing approaches - expect an unpredictable tactical contest

2 seasons

Detail view (PressingIntensityDetailView)

Match Dynamic: TACTICAL BATTLE

Mixed pressing approaches create an unpredictable contest.

PPDA

11.8vs9.6

DAR

0.0% vs0.0%

Northbridge United

Passive81%Aggressive

Based on 0 matches

ATK

MID

DEF

Unknown

Insufficient data to classify pressing approach.

Castlepoint FC

Passive90%Aggressive

Based on 0 matches

ATK

MID

DEF

Unknown

Insufficient data to classify pressing approach.

Stats based on fewer than 10 matches may be less reliable.

Pressing intensity scale

Elite press<8 PPDA

Strong press8-12 PPDACPT

Mid block12-16 PPDA

Passive≥16 PPDA

Fallback · neutral · stale

Pressing Intensity

Very high

Both squads register similar pressing intensity — sample is older than the usual window.

Mixed pressing approaches - expect an unpredictable tactical contest

Pressing data lags the usual freshness window.

2 seasons

Detail view (PressingIntensityDetailView)

Match Dynamic: TACTICAL BATTLE

Mixed pressing approaches create an unpredictable contest.

PPDA

10.5vs10.8

DAR

0.0% vs0.0%

Northbridge United

Passive88%Aggressive

Based on 0 matches

ATK

MID

DEF

Unknown

Insufficient data to classify pressing approach.

Castlepoint FC

Passive86%Aggressive

Based on 0 matches

ATK

MID

DEF

Unknown

Insufficient data to classify pressing approach.

Stats based on fewer than 10 matches may be less reliable.

Pressing intensity scale

Elite press<8 PPDA

Strong press8-12 PPDACurrent

Mid block12-16 PPDA

Passive≥16 PPDA

Chance Quality (xG)

chance_qualityoffenseChanceQualityDetailView

Strong · home · fresh

Chance Quality (xG)

Very high

NBU generates substantially higher xG per match.

NBU
2.78 xG Many quality chances

CPT
0.94 xG Few chances

2 seasons

Detail view (ChanceQualityDetailView)

Total xG Per Match

+1.84 xG · NBU

2.78xG

0.94xG

Lg avg 1.6 xG

Big Chances Per Match

+3.7 chances · NBU

4.8chances

1.2chances

Lg avg 2.6

xG Conceded Per Match

−0.86 xG · NBU

0.92xG

1.78xG

Lg avg 1.6 xG

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Chance creation scale

Many quality chances≥ 2.0NBU

Good creation1.5-2.0

Average output1.0-1.5

Few chances< 1.0

Moderate · away · fresh

Chance Quality (xG)

Very high

CPT edges ahead on chance quality across the recent sample.

NBU
1.18 xG Average output

CPT
1.62 xG Good creation

2 seasons

Detail view (ChanceQualityDetailView)

Total xG Per Match

−0.44 xG · CPT

1.18xG

1.62xG

Lg avg 1.6 xG

Big Chances Per Match

−0.8 chances · CPT

1.9chances

2.7chances

Lg avg 2.6

xG Conceded Per Match

+0.25 xG · CPT

1.40xG

1.15xG

Lg avg 1.6 xG

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Chance creation scale

Many quality chances≥ 2.0

Good creation1.5-2.0CPT

Average output1.0-1.5

Few chances< 1.0

Fallback · neutral · stale

Chance Quality (xG)

Very high

Both squads generate similar chance quality in a limited recent sample.

NBU
1.42 xG Average output

CPT
1.38 xG Average output

xG data lags the usual freshness window.

2 seasons

Detail view (ChanceQualityDetailView)

xG data is 12h+ old

Total xG Per Match

+0.04 xG · NBU

1.42xG

1.38xG

8 matches

Lg avg 1.6 xG

8 matches

Big Chances Per Match

+0.1 chances · NBU

2.1chances

2.0chances

Lg avg 2.6

xG Conceded Per Match

−0.04 xG · NBU

1.32xG

1.36xG

8 matches

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Chance creation scale

Many quality chances≥ 2.0

Good creation1.5-2.0

Average output1.0-1.5

Few chances< 1.0

Territorial Control

territorial_controloffenseTerritorialControlDetailView

Strong · home · fresh

Territorial Control

Very high

NBU sustains heavy time in the opposition third.

NBUPoss62%
·DA52.0
·Pass86%
High control

CPTPoss38%
·DA28.0
·Pass76%
Limited

2 seasons

Detail view (TerritorialControlDetailView)

Possession

+24.0 % · NBU

62.0%

38.0%

Pass Accuracy

+10 % · NBU

86%

76%

Dangerous Attacks / Match

+24.0 · NBU

52.0

28.0

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Possession scale

High control≥57%NBU

Above average53-57%

Average47-53%

Limited<47%

Tier based on possession gap between teams, not absolute values.

Moderate · away · fresh

Territorial Control

Very high

CPT controls more dangerous territory per match.

NBUPoss45%
·DA34.0
·Pass80%
Limited

CPTPoss55%
·DA44.0
·Pass83%
Above avg

2 seasons

Detail view (TerritorialControlDetailView)

Possession

−10.0 % · CPT

45.0%

55.0%

Pass Accuracy

−3 % · CPT

80%

83%

Dangerous Attacks / Match

−10.0 · CPT

34.0

44.0

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Possession scale

High control≥57%

Above average53-57%CPT

Average47-53%

Limited<47%

Tier based on possession gap between teams, not absolute values.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Territorial Control

Very high

Territorial split is even across the recent sample — data is older than usual.

NBUPoss51%
·DA38.0
·Pass81%
Average

CPTPoss49%
·DA36.0
·Pass80%
Average

Territorial data is older than the usual window.

2 seasons

Detail view (TerritorialControlDetailView)

Possession

+2.0 % · NBU

51.0%

49.0%

8 matches

Pass Accuracy

+1 % · NBU

81%

80%

8 matches

Dangerous Attacks / Match

+2.0 · NBU

38.0

36.0

8 matches

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Possession scale

High control≥57%

Above average53-57%

Average47-53%

Limited<47%

Tier based on possession gap between teams, not absolute values.

Possession Efficiency

possession_efficiencyoffensePossessionEfficiencyDetailView

Strong · home · fresh

Possession Efficiency

Very high

NBU converts possession into shots more efficiently.

NBUEPV4.1
·Shot39%
·Pass89%
Below Avg

CPTEPV2.3
·Shot24%
·Pass79%
Inefficient

2 seasons

Detail view (PossessionEfficiencyDetailView)

EPV (xG per possession)

+1.78 · NBU

4.12

2.34

Lg avg 3.21

Shot Accuracy (SoT/Shots)

+15 % · NBU

39%

24%

Lg avg 33%

Pass Accuracy

+11 % · NBU

89%

79%

Lg avg 82%

Possession efficiency scale

Above Average≥5.5

Average4.5-5.5

Below Avg3.5-4.5NBU

Inefficient<3.5

EPV measures xG generated per possession unit.

Moderate · away · fresh

Possession Efficiency

Very high

CPT carries a small edge in shot creation per possession.

NBUEPV3.0
·Shot31%
·Pass82%
Inefficient

CPTEPV3.4
·Shot35%
·Pass84%
Inefficient

2 seasons

Detail view (PossessionEfficiencyDetailView)

EPV (xG per possession)

−0.34 · CPT

3.04

3.38

Lg avg 3.21

Shot Accuracy (SoT/Shots)

−4 % · CPT

31%

35%

Lg avg 33%

Pass Accuracy

−3 % · CPT

82%

84%

Lg avg 82%

Possession efficiency scale

Above Average≥5.5

Average4.5-5.5

Below Avg3.5-4.5

Inefficient<3.5CPT

EPV measures xG generated per possession unit.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Possession Efficiency

Very high

Both squads convert possession at similar rates in a limited sample.

NBUEPV3.2
·Shot32%
·Pass82%
Inefficient

CPTEPV3.2
·Shot32%
·Pass82%
Inefficient

Possession-efficiency sample is small and older than usual.

2 seasons

Detail view (PossessionEfficiencyDetailView)

EPV (xG per possession)

−0.04 · CPT

3.18

3.22

8 matches

Lg avg 3.21

8 matches

Shot Accuracy (SoT/Shots)

32%

Lg avg 33%

Pass Accuracy

−0 % · CPT

82%

Lg avg 82%

Possession efficiency scale

Above Average≥5.5

Average4.5-5.5

Below Avg3.5-4.5

Inefficient<3.5Current

EPV measures xG generated per possession unit.

Squad Availability

availabilitycontextAvailabilityDetailView

Strong · away · fresh

Squad Availability

Very high

NBU is missing multiple regular starters; CPT is near-full strength.

NBU +1
4 out DEF:2MID:1FWD:1
2.10Crisis

CPT
1 out MID:1
0.20Weakened

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (AvailabilityDetailView)

NBUCrisis

DEF:2MID:1FWD:1

4 players out

GK Absent

CPTWeakened

MID:1

1 player out

1 returning soon

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Availability impact scale

Full StrengthImpact 0CPT

Minor Gaps0.01–0.15

Weakened0.16–0.50

Crisis0.50+

Position-weighted impact: accounts for which positions are affected, injury severity, and squad depth.

Moderate · home · fresh

Squad Availability

Very high

CPT is missing one regular starter.

NBU
1 out MID:1
0.30Weakened

CPT
2 out DEF:1FWD:1
0.90Crisis

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (AvailabilityDetailView)

NBUWeakened

MID:1

1 player out

CPTCrisis

DEF:1FWD:1

2 players out

Thin squad

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Availability impact scale

Full StrengthImpact 0

Minor Gaps0.01–0.15NBU

Weakened0.16–0.50

Crisis0.50+

Position-weighted impact: accounts for which positions are affected, injury severity, and squad depth.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Squad Availability

Very high

Both squads have minor availability concerns — list is older than usual.

NBU
1 out MID:1
0.20Weakened

CPT
1 out MID:1
0.20Weakened

Availability list is older than the usual freshness window.

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (AvailabilityDetailView)

NBU

MID:1

1 player out

1 returning soon

CPT

MID:1

1 player out

1 returning soon

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Availability impact scale

Full StrengthImpact 0

Minor Gaps0.01–0.15

Weakened0.16–0.50

Crisis0.50+

Position-weighted impact: accounts for which positions are affected, injury severity, and squad depth.

Home Advantage

venuecontextVenueDetailViz

Strong · home · fresh

Home Advantage

Very high

NBU carries a strong sustained home record.

NBU

82%home wins

Fortress home

CPTVisiting

2 seasons

Detail view (VenueDetailViz)

STADIUM INFO

Northbridge Arena

Northbridge

Large · 58,450GrassOpen Air

HOME RECORD

Fortress home

NBU82% win rate

Wins

Draws

Losses

HOME MATCHES

Based on 17 home matches

2025-26

W3-0vs Stormgate FCAug 23

W2-1vs Westcliff UnitedSep 20

W4-1vs Riverside AthleticOct 18

D1-1vs Greenmoor FCNov 8

W2-0vs Old Park RoversDec 13

2024-25

W2-0vs Stormgate FCSep 14

W3-1vs Westcliff UnitedOct 26

W1-0vs Riverside AthleticDec 7

W4-0vs Greenmoor FCFeb 8

D1-1vs Old Park RoversMar 15

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Home advantage scale

Fortress home70%+ wins

Strong home55-70% winsNBU

League average40-55% wins

Weak home<40% wins

Shows how home record compares to league average.

Moderate · home · fresh

Home Advantage

Very high

NBU carries a slight home advantage.

NBU

47%home wins

League average

CPTVisiting

2 seasons

Detail view (VenueDetailViz)

STADIUM INFO

Northbridge Arena

Northbridge

Large · 42,500GrassOpen Air

HOME RECORD

League average

NBU47% win rate

Wins

Draws

Losses

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Home advantage scale

Fortress home70%+ wins

Strong home55-70% wins

League average40-55% winsNBU

Weak home<40% wins

Shows how home record compares to league average.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Home Advantage

Very high

Home advantage is muted at this venue in the recent window.

NBU

35%home wins

Weak home

CPTVisiting

Venue history is older than the usual window.

2 seasons

Detail view (VenueDetailViz)

STADIUM INFO

Northbridge Arena

Northbridge

Medium · 28,000GrassOpen Air

HOME RECORD

Weak home

NBU35% win rate

Wins

Draws

Losses

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Home advantage scale

Fortress home70%+ wins

Strong home55-70% wins

League average40-55% wins

Weak home<40% wins

Shows how home record compares to league average.

Fixture Congestion

schedulecontextScheduleDetailViz

Strong · home · fresh

Fixture Congestion

Very high

CPT faces a heavily congested midweek schedule.

NBU
 8 daysExtended rest

CPT
 2 daysVery short rest

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (ScheduleDetailViz)

RECOVERY TIME

8days

Extended

NBU

2days

Very Short

CPT

More recovery days = better physical readiness

TRAVEL DISTANCE

Home ground

No travel

NBU

1,450 km

No travel

CPT

Distance from home stadium to match venue (Haversine)

FIXTURE CONGESTION

NBUHeavy

100% density

Fixture congestion level

Last 7-day window

CPTHeavy

100% density

Fixture congestion level

Last 7-day window

Higher congestion = more fixture density in recent weeks

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Rest advantage scale

Extended rest7+ days

Normal recovery4-6 daysNBU

Short rest3 days

Very short rest≤2 days

Shows how rest days between matches affect performance.

Moderate · away · fresh

Fixture Congestion

Very high

NBU carries a slightly heavier travel and rest disadvantage.

NBU
 4 daysNormal recovery

CPT
 6 daysNormal recovery

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (ScheduleDetailViz)

RECOVERY TIME

4days

Normal

NBU

6days

Normal

CPT

More recovery days = better physical readiness

TRAVEL DISTANCE

850 km

No travel

NBU

120 km

No travel

CPT

Distance from home stadium to match venue (Haversine)

FIXTURE CONGESTION

NBUHeavy

100% density

Fixture congestion level

Last 7-day window

CPTHeavy

100% density

Fixture congestion level

Last 7-day window

Higher congestion = more fixture density in recent weeks

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Rest advantage scale

Extended rest7+ days

Normal recovery4-6 days

Short rest3 daysCPT

Very short rest≤2 days

Shows how rest days between matches affect performance.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Fixture Congestion

Very high

Both squads have similar rest and travel ahead of kickoff.

NBU
 5 daysNormal recovery

CPT
 5 daysNormal recovery

Schedule data is older than the usual window.

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (ScheduleDetailViz)

RECOVERY TIME

5days

Normal

NBU

5days

Normal

CPT

More recovery days = better physical readiness

TRAVEL DISTANCE

120 km

No travel

NBU

150 km

No travel

CPT

Distance from home stadium to match venue (Haversine)

FIXTURE CONGESTION

NBUHeavy

100% density

Fixture congestion level

Last 7-day window

CPTHeavy

100% density

Fixture congestion level

Last 7-day window

Higher congestion = more fixture density in recent weeks

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Rest advantage scale

Extended rest7+ days

Normal recovery4-6 days

Short rest3 days

Very short rest≤2 days

Shows how rest days between matches affect performance.

GK Shot-Stopping

goalkeeperdefenseGoalkeeperDetailViz

Strong · home · fresh

GK Shot-Stopping

Very high

NBU's keeper is outperforming post-shot xG by a clear margin.

NBU+6.1 GSAx Elite shot-stopper

CPT-2.3 GSAx Below expected

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (GoalkeeperDetailViz)

GSAx

++8.4 · NBU

+6.1

-2.3

Clean Sheet Rate

+32 % · NBU

42%

11%

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Shot-stopping scale

Elite shot-stopper≥ +5.0NBU

Above average+2 to +5

League average-1 to +2

Below expected< -1

Shows how goalkeeper performance compares to expected saves.

Moderate · away · fresh

GK Shot-Stopping

Very high

CPT's keeper edges ahead on shot-stopping in the recent window.

NBU+0.4 GSAx League average

CPT+2.1 GSAx Above average

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (GoalkeeperDetailViz)

GSAx

−+1.7 · CPT

+0.4

+2.1

Clean Sheet Rate

−11 % · CPT

26%

37%

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Shot-stopping scale

Elite shot-stopper≥ +5.0

Above average+2 to +5CPT

League average-1 to +2

Below expected< -1

Shows how goalkeeper performance compares to expected saves.

High uncertainty · neutral · stale

GK Shot-Stopping

Very high

GK shot-stopping data is limited in this league — read with caution.

NBU+0.2 GSAx League average

CPT+0.1 GSAx League average

GK shot-stopping data has limited coverage in this league (uncertainty 0.95).

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (GoalkeeperDetailViz)

GSAx

++0.1 · NBU

+0.2

+0.1

6 matches

Clean Sheet Rate

17%

6 matches

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Shot-stopping scale

Elite shot-stopper≥ +5.0

Above average+2 to +5

League average-1 to +2

Below expected< -1

Shows how goalkeeper performance compares to expected saves.

Defensive Reliability

defensive_reliabilitydefenseDefensiveReliabilityDetailViz

Strong · home · fresh

Defensive Reliability

Very high

NBU concedes notably fewer high-quality chances per match.

NBUxGA0.85
·CS48%
Solid

CPTxGA1.85
·CS12%
Vulnerable

2 seasons

Detail view (DefensiveReliabilityDetailViz)

xGA / Match

−1.00 · NBU

0.85

1.85

Lg avg 1.32

Clean Sheet Rate

+36 % · NBU

48%

12%

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Defensive reliability scale

Elite defending≤0.80NBU

Solid defending0.80-1.25

Average defending1.25-1.70

Defensive vulnerability≥1.70

Shows defensive quality based on expected goals allowed and clean sheet rate.

Moderate · away · fresh

Defensive Reliability

Very high

CPT carries a small defensive edge in the recent sample.

NBUxGA1.40
·CS25%
Average

CPTxGA1.15
·CS32%
Solid

2 seasons

Detail view (DefensiveReliabilityDetailViz)

xGA / Match

+0.25 · CPT

1.40

1.15

Lg avg 1.32

Clean Sheet Rate

−7 % · CPT

25%

32%

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Defensive reliability scale

Elite defending≤0.80

Solid defending0.80-1.25CPT

Average defending1.25-1.70

Defensive vulnerability≥1.70

Shows defensive quality based on expected goals allowed and clean sheet rate.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Defensive Reliability

Very high

Both back-lines concede comparable chance volume in a limited sample.

NBUxGA1.25
·CS28%
Solid

CPTxGA1.22
·CS27%
Solid

xGA sample is older than the usual window.

2 seasons

Detail view (DefensiveReliabilityDetailViz)

xGA / Match

+0.03 · CPT

1.25

1.22

8 matches

Lg avg 1.32

8 matches

Clean Sheet Rate

+1 % · NBU

28%

27%

8 matches

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Defensive reliability scale

Elite defending≤0.80

Solid defending0.80-1.25

Average defending1.25-1.70

Defensive vulnerability≥1.70

Shows defensive quality based on expected goals allowed and clean sheet rate.

Set Piece Threat

set_piece_threatoffenseSetPieceThreatViz

Strong · home · fresh

Set Piece Threat

Very high

NBU carries a clear set-piece threat advantage.

NBUThr82%
·Cor7.2
·Aer62%
Dangerous

CPTThr38%
·Cor4.6
·Aer47%
Average

2 seasons

Detail view (SetPieceThreatViz)

Corners / Match

+2.6 · NBU

7.2

4.6

Lg avg 5.2

Aerial Win %

+15 % · NBU

62%

47%

Lg avg 49%

Set piece threat scale

Dangerous≥75%NBU

Effective50-75%

Average30-50%

Limited<30%

Combines corner frequency and aerial dominance to measure set piece danger.

Moderate · away · fresh

Set Piece Threat

Very high

CPT edges ahead on set-piece conversion.

NBUThr44%
·Cor4.9
·Aer50%
Average

CPTThr61%
·Cor5.4
·Aer55%
Effective

2 seasons

Detail view (SetPieceThreatViz)

Corners / Match

−0.5 · CPT

4.9

5.4

Lg avg 5.2

Aerial Win %

−5 % · CPT

50%

55%

Lg avg 49%

Set piece threat scale

Dangerous≥75%

Effective50-75%CPT

Average30-50%

Limited<30%

Combines corner frequency and aerial dominance to measure set piece danger.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Set Piece Threat

Very high

Both squads convert set-pieces at similar rates.

NBUThr42%
·Cor5.1
·Aer50%
Average

CPTThr40%
·Cor5.0
·Aer49%
Average

Set-piece sample is older than the usual window.

2 seasons

Detail view (SetPieceThreatViz)

Corners / Match

+0.1 · NBU

5.1

5.0

8 matches

Lg avg 5.2

8 matches

Aerial Win %

+1 % · NBU

50%

49%

8 matches

Lg avg 49%

8 matches

Set piece threat scale

Dangerous≥75%

Effective50-75%

Average30-50%Current

Limited<30%

Combines corner frequency and aerial dominance to measure set piece danger.

Conversion Efficiency

conversion_efficiencyoffenseConversionEfficiencyViz

Strong · away · fresh

Conversion Efficiency

Very high

CPT converts well above expected goals across the sample.

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (ConversionEfficiencyViz)

Goals vs xG

N/A

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Finishing quality scale

Clinical≥+15%

Above expected+5% to +15%CPT

Expected rate-10% to +5%

Wasteful<-10%

Shows finishing quality: goals scored compared to xG (expected goals).

Moderate · home · fresh

Conversion Efficiency

Very high

NBU converts at roughly expected rates with a slight edge.

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (ConversionEfficiencyViz)

Goals vs xG

N/A

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Finishing quality scale

Clinical≥+15%

Above expected+5% to +15%

Expected rate-10% to +5%NBU

Wasteful<-10%

Shows finishing quality: goals scored compared to xG (expected goals).

Fallback · neutral · stale

Conversion Efficiency

Very high

Both squads convert at roughly expected rates in a limited sample.

Goal-vs-xG sample is older than the usual window.

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (ConversionEfficiencyViz)

Goals vs xG

N/A

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Finishing quality scale

Clinical≥+15%

Above expected+5% to +15%

Expected rate-10% to +5%

Wasteful<-10%

Shows finishing quality: goals scored compared to xG (expected goals).

League Position

league_positioncontextLeaguePositionViz

Strong · home · fresh

League Position

Very high

League position indicates significant NBU advantage.

1st

NBU

78 pts · 2.36 PPG

title

17places

18th

CPT

24 pts · 0.73 PPG

relegation

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (LeaguePositionViz)

Current Standings

#	Team	P	W	D	L
1	Northbridge United	33	24	6	3
2	Stormgate FC	33	21	6	6
3	Westcliff United	33	19	8	6
4	Old Park Rovers	33	18	6	9
13 teams
18	Castlepoint FC	33	6	6	21

1st

NBU

78 pts · 2.36 PPG

Title Race

18th

CPT

24 pts · 0.73 PPG

Relegation Zone

Position Comparison

Position Gap17 places

Points Gap54 points

PPG2.36vs0.73 (+1.63)

Goal Difference+52vs-32 (+84)

Zone Context

NBU

Title Race

Competing for top honors

CPT

Relegation Zone

Fighting to stay up

Based on current league standings (20 teams)

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Standings quality scale

Clear advantage8+ places

Notable gap4-7 placesNBU

Close positions±3 places

DisadvantagedBehind

Shows team quality based on current league standings and points per match.

Moderate · away · fresh

League Position

Very high

CPT sits slightly higher in the table than NBU.

9th

NBU

42 pts · 1.27 PPG

mid table

3places

6th

CPT

48 pts · 1.45 PPG

european

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (LeaguePositionViz)

Current Standings

#	Team	P	W	D	L
5	Greenmoor FC	33	14	9	10
6	Castlepoint FC	33	13	9	11
7	Highvale FC	33	12	9	12
1 teams
9	Northbridge United	33	11	9	13

9th

NBU

42 pts · 1.27 PPG

Mid-Table

6th

CPT

48 pts · 1.45 PPG

Europa League

Position Comparison

Position Gap3 places

Points Gap6 points

PPG1.27vs1.45 (+0.18)

Goal Difference+2vs+8 (-6)

Zone Context

NBU

Mid-Table

Comfortable in the middle

CPT

Europa League

European qualification battle

Based on current league standings (20 teams)

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Standings quality scale

Clear advantage8+ places

Notable gap4-7 places

Close positions±3 placesCPT

DisadvantagedBehind

Shows team quality based on current league standings and points per match.

Fallback · neutral · stale

League Position

Very high

Both squads sit in mid-table with similar points-per-match.

10th

NBU

36 pts · 1.09 PPG

mid table

1places

11th

CPT

35 pts · 1.06 PPG

mid table

League standings reflect an older snapshot than usual.

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (LeaguePositionViz)

10th

NBU

36 pts · 1.09 PPG

Mid-Table

11th

CPT

35 pts · 1.06 PPG

Mid-Table

Position Comparison

Position Gap1 places

Points Gap1 points

PPG1.09vs1.06 (+0.03)

Goal Difference0vs-1 (+1)

Zone Context

NBU

Mid-Table

Comfortable in the middle

CPT

Mid-Table

Comfortable in the middle

Based on current league standings (20 teams)

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Standings quality scale

Clear advantage8+ places

Notable gap4-7 places

Close positions±3 places

DisadvantagedBehind

Shows team quality based on current league standings and points per match.

Aerial Dominance

aerial_dominanceoffenseAerialDominanceViz

Strong · home · fresh

Aerial Dominance

Very high

NBU wins a clear majority of aerial duels.

NBUWin66%
·Aerials19.8
Dominant

CPTWin42%
·Aerials17.6
Weak

2 seasons

Detail view (AerialDominanceViz)

Aerial Win Rate

+24 % · NBU

66%

42%

Lg avg 50%

Aerials / Match

+2.2 · NBU

19.8

17.6

Lg avg 18.5

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Aerial win rate scale

Dominant≥60%

Strong53-60%NBU

Balanced47-53%

Weak<47%

Shows aerial duel win percentage for the favored team.

Moderate · away · fresh

Aerial Dominance

Very high

CPT edges ahead on aerial duel win rate.

NBUWin49%
·Aerials18.2
Average

CPTWin55%
·Aerials17.8
Above avg

2 seasons

Detail view (AerialDominanceViz)

Aerial Win Rate

−6 % · CPT

49%

55%

Lg avg 50%

Aerials / Match

+0.4 · NBU

18.2

17.8

Lg avg 18.5

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Aerial win rate scale

Dominant≥60%

Strong53-60%

Balanced47-53%CPT

Weak<47%

Shows aerial duel win percentage for the favored team.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Aerial Dominance

Very high

Both squads win comparable shares of aerial duels.

NBUWin50%
·Aerials18.0
Average

CPTWin50%
·Aerials18.0
Average

Aerial duel sample is older than the usual window.

2 seasons

Detail view (AerialDominanceViz)

Aerial data unavailable

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Aerial win rate scale

Dominant≥60%

Strong53-60%

Balanced47-53%

Weak<47%

Shows aerial duel win percentage for the favored team.

Counter Attack Threat

counter_attackoffenseCounterAttackViz

Strong · away · fresh

Counter Attack Threat

Very high

CPT carries a clear transition-threat advantage.

NBU1.7/m

counters

4.2/m CPT

2 seasons

Detail view (CounterAttackViz)

Counters / Match

−2.5 · CPT

1.7

4.2

Dangerous Attack Ratio

−28 % · CPT

30%

58%

Lg avg 47%

Ball Recovery / Match

−13.0 · CPT

35.0

48.0

Lg avg 44.5

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Counter attack scale

Elite threat≥4.0/match

Strong threat2.5-4.0CPT

Moderate1.5-2.5

Low threat<1.5

Shows counter-attacking threat based on frequency and dangerous attack ratio.

Moderate · home · fresh

Counter Attack Threat

Very high

NBU edges ahead on transitions converted into dangerous attacks.

NBU3.0/m

counters

2.4/m CPT

2 seasons

Detail view (CounterAttackViz)

Counters / Match

+0.6 · NBU

3.0

2.4

Dangerous Attack Ratio

+8 % · NBU

48%

40%

Lg avg 47%

Ball Recovery / Match

+4.0 · NBU

42.0

38.0

Lg avg 44.5

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Counter attack scale

Elite threat≥4.0/match

Strong threat2.5-4.0

Moderate1.5-2.5NBU

Low threat<1.5

Shows counter-attacking threat based on frequency and dangerous attack ratio.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Counter Attack Threat

Very high

Both squads transition at similar rates in a limited sample.

NBU2.4/m

counters

2.5/m CPT

Counter-attack sample is older than the usual window.

2 seasons

Detail view (CounterAttackViz)

Counters / Match

−0.1 · CPT

2.4

2.5

8 matches

Dangerous Attack Ratio

−1 % · CPT

40%

41%

8 matches

Lg avg 47%

8 matches

Ball Recovery / Match

−2.0 · CPT

38.0

40.0

8 matches

Lg avg 44.5

8 matches

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Counter attack scale

Elite threat≥4.0/match

Strong threat2.5-4.0

Moderate1.5-2.5

Low threat<1.5

Shows counter-attacking threat based on frequency and dangerous attack ratio.

Crossing Quality

crossing_qualityoffenseCrossingQualityDetailView

Strong · home · fresh

Crossing Quality

Very high

NBU delivers crosses with substantially higher accuracy.

NBUAcc36%
·Crosses20.4
Excellent

CPTAcc18%
·Crosses13.6
Poor

2 seasons

Detail view (CrossingQualityDetailView)

Crossing Accuracy

+18.0 % · NBU

36.0%

18.0%

Lg avg 22%

Crosses / Match

+6.8 · NBU

20.4

13.6

Lg avg 17.8

Crossing quality scale

Excellent accuracy≥30%NBU

Good accuracy25-30%

Average accuracy20-25%

Poor accuracy<20%

Moderate · away · fresh

Crossing Quality

Very high

CPT edges ahead on crossing accuracy.

NBUAcc24%
·Crosses16.2
Average

CPTAcc30%
·Crosses14.8
Excellent

2 seasons

Detail view (CrossingQualityDetailView)

Crossing Accuracy

−6.0 % · CPT

24.0%

30.0%

Lg avg 22%

Crosses / Match

+1.4 · NBU

16.2

14.8

Lg avg 17.8

Crossing quality scale

Excellent accuracy≥30%CPT

Good accuracy25-30%

Average accuracy20-25%

Poor accuracy<20%

Fallback · neutral · stale

Crossing Quality

Very high

Both squads cross at similar volume and accuracy in a limited sample.

NBUAcc25%
·Crosses15.0
Good

CPTAcc26%
·Crosses15.2
Good

Crossing sample is older than the usual window.

2 seasons

Detail view (CrossingQualityDetailView)

Crossing Accuracy

−1.0 % · CPT

25.0%

26.0%

8 matches

Lg avg 22%

8 matches

Crosses / Match

−0.2 · CPT

15.0

15.2

8 matches

Lg avg 17.8

8 matches

Crossing quality scale

Excellent accuracy≥30%

Good accuracy25-30%Current

Average accuracy20-25%

Poor accuracy<20%

Creativity

creativityoffenseCreativityViz

Strong · home · fresh

Creativity

Very high

NBU generates substantially more key passes and big chances created.

NBUKP13.4
·BC3.1
·Ast1.5
Elite creation

CPTKP7.2
·BC1.2
·Ast0.7
Average creativity

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (CreativityViz)

Key Passes / Match

+6.2 · NBU

13.4

7.2

Lg avg 9.6

Big Chances / Match

+1.9 · NBU

3.1

1.2

Lg avg 2.6

Assists / Match

+0.80 · NBU

1.50

0.70

Lg avg 1.30

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Creativity scale

Elite creation≥10.0/match

Strong8.0-10.0NBU

Average6.0-8.0

Limited<6.0/match

Moderate · away · fresh

Creativity

Very high

CPT edges ahead on chance creation per match.

NBUKP8.6
·BC1.6
·Ast0.9
Strong creativity

CPTKP10.2
·BC2.1
·Ast1.1
Elite creation

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (CreativityViz)

Key Passes / Match

−1.6 · CPT

8.6

10.2

Lg avg 9.6

Big Chances / Match

−0.5 · CPT

1.6

2.1

Lg avg 2.6

Assists / Match

−0.20 · CPT

0.90

1.10

Lg avg 1.30

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Creativity scale

Elite creation≥10.0/match

Strong8.0-10.0

Average6.0-8.0CPT

Limited<6.0/match

Fallback · neutral · stale

Creativity

Very high

Both squads create comparable volume in a limited sample.

NBUKP9.4
·BC1.8
·Ast1.0
Strong creativity

CPTKP9.2
·BC1.7
·Ast1.0
Strong creativity

Creativity sample is older than the usual window.

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (CreativityViz)

Key Passes / Match

+0.2 · NBU

9.4

9.2

8 matches

Lg avg 9.6

8 matches

Big Chances / Match

+0.1 · NBU

1.8

1.7

8 matches

Lg avg 2.6

8 matches

Assists / Match

1.00

8 matches

Lg avg 1.30

8 matches

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Creativity scale

Elite creation≥10.0/match

Strong8.0-10.0

Average6.0-8.0

Limited<6.0/match

Tackle Efficiency

tackle_efficiencydefenseTackleEfficiencyDetailViz

Strong · home · fresh

Tackle Efficiency

Very high

NBU wins a clear majority of attempted tackles.

NBUSuccess1%
·Tackles16.8
Weak

CPTSuccess1%
·Tackles9.4
Weak

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (TackleEfficiencyDetailViz)

Tackle Success

+0.3 % · NBU

0.8%

0.5%

Tackles Won / Match

+7.4 · NBU

16.8

9.4

Interceptions / Match

+4.8 · NBU

11.2

6.4

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Tackle efficiency scale

Elite efficiency≥70%

Strong efficiency60-70%NBU

Average50-60%

Weak<50%

Moderate · away · fresh

Tackle Efficiency

Very high

CPT edges ahead on tackle success rate.

NBUSuccess1%
·Tackles12.4
Weak

CPTSuccess1%
·Tackles14.2
Weak

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (TackleEfficiencyDetailViz)

Tackle Success

−0.1 % · CPT

0.6%

0.7%

Tackles Won / Match

−1.8 · CPT

12.4

14.2

Interceptions / Match

−1.4 · CPT

8.4

9.8

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Tackle efficiency scale

Elite efficiency≥70%

Strong efficiency60-70%

Average50-60%CPT

Weak<50%

Fallback · neutral · stale

Tackle Efficiency

Very high

Both squads win attempted tackles at similar rates.

NBUSuccess1%
·Tackles12.0
Weak

CPTSuccess1%
·Tackles12.1
Weak

Tackle sample is older than the usual window.

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (TackleEfficiencyDetailViz)

Tackle Success

0.6%

8 matches

Tackles Won / Match

−0.1 · CPT

12.0

12.1

8 matches

Interceptions / Match

+0.2 · NBU

8.8

8.6

8 matches

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Tackle efficiency scale

Elite efficiency≥70%

Strong efficiency60-70%

Average50-60%

Weak<50%

Aerial Defense

aerial_defensedefenseAerialDefenseViz

Strong · away · fresh

Aerial Defense

Very high

CPT loses notably fewer defensive aerials per match.

NBULoss52%
·Losses9.4
Average

CPTLoss28%
·Losses4.2
Dominant

2 seasons

Detail view (AerialDefenseViz)

Aerial Loss Rate

+24 % · CPT

52%

28%

Lg avg 50%

Losses / Match

+5.2 · CPT

9.4

4.2

Lg avg 8.4

Duels / Match

+3.6 · NBU

18.6

15.0

Lg avg 17.4

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Aerial defense scale

Dominant≤40%

Solid40-47%CPT

Average47-53%

Vulnerable>53%

Shows vulnerability to aerial attacks based on aerial duels lost.

Moderate · home · fresh

Aerial Defense

Very high

NBU edges ahead on defensive aerial reliability.

NBULoss36%
·Losses6.0
Dominant

CPTLoss42%
·Losses7.4
Solid

2 seasons

Detail view (AerialDefenseViz)

Aerial Loss Rate

−6 % · NBU

36%

42%

Lg avg 50%

Losses / Match

−1.4 · NBU

6.0

7.4

Lg avg 8.4

Duels / Match

−1.0 · CPT

16.6

17.6

Lg avg 17.4

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Aerial defense scale

Dominant≤40%

Solid40-47%

Average47-53%NBU

Vulnerable>53%

Shows vulnerability to aerial attacks based on aerial duels lost.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Aerial Defense

Very high

Both back-lines concede comparable aerial volume in a limited sample.

NBULoss40%
·Losses7.2
Dominant

CPTLoss41%
·Losses7.4
Solid

Aerial-defence sample is older than the usual window.

2 seasons

Detail view (AerialDefenseViz)

Aerial Loss Rate

−1 % · NBU

40%

41%

8 matches

Lg avg 50%

8 matches

Losses / Match

−0.2 · NBU

7.2

7.4

8 matches

Lg avg 8.4

8 matches

Duels / Match

18.0

8 matches

Lg avg 17.4

8 matches

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Aerial defense scale

Dominant≤40%

Solid40-47%

Average47-53%

Vulnerable>53%

Shows vulnerability to aerial attacks based on aerial duels lost.

Defensive Discipline

error_pronedefenseErrorProneViz

Strong · away · fresh

Defensive Discipline

Very high

NBU commits more fouls and concedes more cards per match.

NBUIndis78%
·Fouls15.2
Reckless

CPTIndis24%
·Fouls9.4
Average

2 seasons

Detail view (ErrorProneViz)

Indiscipline

N/A

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Discipline scale

Disciplined<30%

Average30-50%

Undisciplined50-70%CPT

Reckless≥70%

Shows discipline based on fouls and cards per match.

Moderate · home · fresh

Defensive Discipline

Very high

CPT commits slightly more fouls per match.

NBUIndis32%
·Fouls10.4
Average

CPTIndis50%
·Fouls12.6
Average

2 seasons

Detail view (ErrorProneViz)

Indiscipline

N/A

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Discipline scale

Disciplined<30%

Average30-50%

Undisciplined50-70%NBU

Reckless≥70%

Shows discipline based on fouls and cards per match.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Defensive Discipline

Very high

Both squads commit similar foul and card volume per match.

NBUIndis42%
·Fouls11.8
Average

CPTIndis41%
·Fouls11.6
Average

Discipline sample is older than the usual window.

2 seasons

Detail view (ErrorProneViz)

Indiscipline

N/A

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Discipline scale

Disciplined<30%

Average30-50%

Undisciplined50-70%

Reckless≥70%

Shows discipline based on fouls and cards per match.

Discipline Risk

discipline_riskdefenseDisciplineRiskViz

Strong · home · fresh

Discipline Risk

Very high

Discipline clearly favors NBU.

NBUCards1.6
·Fouls10.6
Low Risk

CPTCards2.8
·Fouls14.0
High Risk

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (DisciplineRiskViz)

Cards / Match

−1.2 · NBU

1.6

2.8

Fouls / Match

−3.4 · NBU

10.6

14.0

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Discipline risk scale

Disciplined<1.0 cpm

Low Risk1.0-2.0

Moderate2.0-3.0NBU

High Risk≥3.0 cpm

Cards per match weighted by reds (count as 3). Scales with season scope.

Moderate · away · fresh

Discipline Risk

Very high

Discipline slightly favors CPT.

NBUCards2.2
·Fouls12.2
Moderate

CPTCards1.8
·Fouls10.8
Moderate

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (DisciplineRiskViz)

Cards / Match

+0.4 · CPT

2.2

1.8

Fouls / Match

+1.3 · CPT

12.2

10.8

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Discipline risk scale

Disciplined<1.0 cpm

Low Risk1.0-2.0

Moderate2.0-3.0CPT

High Risk≥3.0 cpm

Cards per match weighted by reds (count as 3). Scales with season scope.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Discipline Risk

Very high

Both squads carry comparable card-volume profiles.

NBUCards1.6
·Fouls11.0
Moderate

CPTCards1.6
·Fouls10.8
Moderate

Discipline sample is older than the usual window.

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (DisciplineRiskViz)

Cards / Match

−0.1 · NBU

1.6

Fouls / Match

+0.2 · CPT

11.0

10.8

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Discipline risk scale

Disciplined<1.0 cpm

Low Risk1.0-2.0

Moderate2.0-3.0

High Risk≥3.0 cpm

Cards per match weighted by reds (count as 3). Scales with season scope.

Manager Effect

manager_effectcontextManagerEffectViz

Strong · home · fresh

Manager Effect

Very high

NBU's new manager is producing a clear early-tenure bounce.

Detail view (ManagerEffectViz)

NBU

Unknown

CPT

Unknown

0.00

PPG

0.00

0 days Tenure 0 days

0 Matches 0

Honeymoon

Phase

Honeymoon

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Manager impact scale

High impactBounce

ModerateSettlingNBU

StableEstablished+

Too earlyHoneymoon

New manager appointments create a performance boost that fades over time. Higher impact = stronger current effect.

Moderate · away · fresh

Manager Effect

Very high

CPT's manager is established with steady PPG.

Detail view (ManagerEffectViz)

NBU

Unknown

CPT

Unknown

0.00

PPG

0.00

0 days Tenure 0 days

0 Matches 0

Honeymoon

Phase

Honeymoon

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Manager impact scale

High impactBounce

ModerateSettling

StableEstablished+CPT

Too earlyHoneymoon

New manager appointments create a performance boost that fades over time. Higher impact = stronger current effect.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Manager Effect

Very high

Both managers are mid-tenure with similar recent PPG.

Manager-tenure sample is older than the usual window.

Detail view (ManagerEffectViz)

NBU

Unknown

CPT

Unknown

0.00

PPG

0.00

0 days Tenure 0 days

0 Matches 0

Honeymoon

Phase

Honeymoon

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

Manager impact scale

High impactBounce

ModerateSettling

StableEstablished+

Too earlyHoneymoon

New manager appointments create a performance boost that fades over time. Higher impact = stronger current effect.

Weather Impact

weather_impactcontextWeatherImpactViz

Strong · away · fresh

Weather Impact

Very high

Heavy rain forecast favours CPT's tactical profile in this venue's history.

rain

9°C·18 km/h·8 mm

0 / 100

NBU

adaptation

1 / 100

CPT

adaptation

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (WeatherImpactViz)

9°C

rain

Wind

km/h

Rain

mm/h

Pitch: Wet

Adaptation Factors

Historical Performance

60% weight

NBU

1.10PPG-0.95

vs 2.05 overall (8 matches)

CPT

1.90PPG+0.48

vs 1.42 overall (7 matches)

Tactical Vulnerability

25% weight

NBU

Low

CPT

Low

Climate Familiarity

15% weight

NBU

0.00

CPT

0.00

Adaptation Comparison

NBU

0/ 100

Adaptation Score

Combined weather adaptation based on history, tactics, and climate

PPG in condition

1.10

-0.95

PPG overall2.05

Record2W-2D-4L

Sample8 matches

VulnerabilityLow

CPT

1/ 100

Adaptation Score

Combined weather adaptation based on history, tactics, and climate

PPG in condition

1.90

+0.48

PPG overall1.42

Record5W-1D-1L

Sample7 matches

VulnerabilityLow

Weather Impact

FavorsCPT

MinimalSlightModerateSignificant

Minimal—Weather is unlikely to influence this match

Weather adaptation scale

Strong advantage≥25

Clear advantage15-25

Moderate edge8-15

Minimal difference<8CPT

Shows adaptation differential based on historical performance, tactical vulnerability, and climate familiarity.

Moderate · home · fresh

Weather Impact

Very high

Cool, mildly breezy conditions slightly favour NBU.

cloudy

14°C·10 km/h

1 / 100

NBU

adaptation

0 / 100

CPT

adaptation

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (WeatherImpactViz)

14°C

cloudy

Wind

km/h

Rain

mm/h

Pitch: Firm

Adaptation Factors

Historical Performance

60% weight

NBU

2.20PPG+0.15

vs 2.05 overall (10 matches)

CPT

1.40PPG-0.05

vs 1.45 overall (8 matches)

Tactical Vulnerability

25% weight

NBU

Low

CPT

Low

Climate Familiarity

15% weight

NBU

0.00

CPT

0.00

Adaptation Comparison

NBU

1/ 100

Adaptation Score

Combined weather adaptation based on history, tactics, and climate

PPG in condition

2.20

+0.15

PPG overall2.05

Record6W-3D-1L

Sample10 matches

VulnerabilityLow

CPT

0/ 100

Adaptation Score

Combined weather adaptation based on history, tactics, and climate

PPG in condition

1.40

-0.05

PPG overall1.45

Record3W-2D-3L

Sample8 matches

VulnerabilityLow

Weather Impact

FavorsNBU

MinimalSlightModerateSignificant

Minimal—Weather is unlikely to influence this match

Weather adaptation scale

Strong advantage≥25

Clear advantage15-25

Moderate edge8-15

Minimal difference<8NBU

Shows adaptation differential based on historical performance, tactical vulnerability, and climate familiarity.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Weather Impact

Very high

Forecast conditions are neutral for both squads.

clear

18°C·6 km/h

1 / 100

NBU

adaptation

1 / 100

CPT

adaptation

Weather-adaptation history is limited.

1 seasoncurrent season only

Detail view (WeatherImpactViz)

18°C

clear

Wind

km/h

Rain

mm/h

Pitch: Firm

Adaptation Factors

Historical Performance

60% weight

NBU

1.90PPG+0.05

vs 1.95 overall (6 matches)

CPT

1.50PPG0.00

vs 1.50 overall (6 matches)

Tactical Vulnerability

25% weight

NBU

Low

CPT

Low

Climate Familiarity

15% weight

NBU

0.00

CPT

0.00

Adaptation Comparison

NBU

1/ 100

Adaptation Score

Combined weather adaptation based on history, tactics, and climate

PPG in condition

1.90

+0.05

PPG overall1.95

Record3W-2D-1L

Sample6 matches

VulnerabilityLow

CPT

1/ 100

Adaptation Score

Combined weather adaptation based on history, tactics, and climate

PPG in condition

1.50

0.00

PPG overall1.50

Record2W-2D-2L

Sample6 matches

VulnerabilityLow

Weather Impact

No clear advantage

MinimalSlightModerateSignificant

Minimal—Weather is unlikely to influence this match

Weather adaptation scale

Strong advantage≥25

Clear advantage15-25

Moderate edge8-15

Minimal difference<8Current

Shows adaptation differential based on historical performance, tactical vulnerability, and climate familiarity.

Referee Profile

referee_tendencycontextRefereeTendencyViz

Strong · away · fresh

Referee Profile

Very high

The appointed referee carries a strict card profile and friction history with NBU.

NBUFriction1
·Record+0%
·Cards14.0

CPTFriction0
·Record+0%
·Cards6.0

2 seasons

Detail view (RefereeTendencyViz)

D. Costa

31 matches officiated

Strict

4.8

Yellows/G

0.30

Reds/G

Fouls/G

0.32

Pens/G

To Home Teams

0.0

cards / g

To Away Teams

0.0

Friction Score— team aggression × referee strictness

Friction

+0 · CPT

Historical Context— record under this referee

NBU

0-0-0WDL

+0% win rate vs opponent

Limited data (n=0)

Based on 0 matches

CPT

0-0-0WDL

+0% win rate vs opponent

Limited data (n=0)

Based on 0 matches

Cards / Match

N/A

Referee disruption scale

Less disruption<0.15

Slight disruption0.15-0.35

Notable disruption0.35-0.60CPT

More disruption≥0.60

Each team's disruption level under this referee, combining friction and card discipline.

Moderate · neutral · fresh

Referee Profile

Very high

The appointed referee carries a balanced card profile.

NBUFriction0
·Record+0%
·Cards6.0

CPTFriction0
·Record+0%
·Cards6.0

2 seasons

Detail view (RefereeTendencyViz)

P. Almeida

23 matches officiated

Average

3.6

Yellows/G

0.10

Reds/G

Fouls/G

0.22

Pens/G

To Home Teams

0.0

cards / g

To Away Teams

0.0

Friction Score— team aggression × referee strictness

Friction

+0 · CPT

Historical Context— record under this referee

NBU

0-0-0WDL

+0% win rate vs opponent

Limited data (n=0)

Based on 0 matches

CPT

0-0-0WDL

+0% win rate vs opponent

Limited data (n=0)

Based on 0 matches

Cards / Match

N/A

Referee disruption scale

Less disruption<0.15Current

Slight disruption0.15-0.35

Notable disruption0.35-0.60

More disruption≥0.60

Each team's disruption level under this referee, combining friction and card discipline.

Fallback · neutral · stale

Referee Profile

Very high

The appointed referee has limited recent matches at this level.

NBUFriction0
·Record+0%
·Cards1.0

CPTFriction0
·Record+0%
·Cards2.0

Referee sample is small and older than usual.

2 seasons

Detail view (RefereeTendencyViz)

R. Voss

6 matches officiated

Average

3.0

Yellows/G

0.00

Reds/G

Fouls/G

0.00

Pens/G

To Home Teams

0.0

cards / g

To Away Teams

0.0

Friction Score— team aggression × referee strictness

Friction

−0 · NBU

Historical Context— record under this referee

NBU

0-0-0WDL

+0% win rate vs opponent

Limited data (n=0)

Based on 0 matches

CPT

0-0-0WDL

+0% win rate vs opponent

Limited data (n=0)

Based on 0 matches

Cards / Match

N/A

Referee disruption scale

Less disruption<0.15Current

Slight disruption0.15-0.35

Notable disruption0.35-0.60

More disruption≥0.60

Each team's disruption level under this referee, combining friction and card discipline.

H2H Record

h2h_recordmatchupH2HRecordViz

Strong · home · fresh

H2H Record

Very high

NBU carries a clear historical head-to-head edge.

1.9

goals/match

NBU

2.00 PPG

6-2-2W-D-L10 meetings

0.9

goals/match

CPT

0.80 PPG

10 meetings

Detail view (H2HRecordViz)

NBU wins

Draws

CPT wins

NBUStrong edge

1.9goals / match

19 goals in 10 meetings

2PPG

CPT

0.9goals / match

9 goals in 10 meetings

0.8PPG

Match Profile

2.8goals per match

Both teams scored0.6%

Over 2.5 goals0.5%

Clean sheets

0.4%

NBU

0.2%

CPT

H2H Streak

NBU

W-W-W · 5 unbeaten

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

H2H record scale

Dominant record> 1.5 PPG

Strong edge0.8–1.5 PPGNBU

Slight edge0.3–0.8 PPG

Even rivalry< 0.3 PPG

Based on points-per-game gap between teams in head-to-head meetings.

Moderate · away · fresh

H2H Record

Very high

CPT edges ahead in recent head-to-heads.

1.2

goals/match

NBU

1.17 PPG

2-1-3W-D-L6 meetings

1.5

goals/match

CPT

1.67 PPG

6 meetings

Detail view (H2HRecordViz)

NBU wins

Draws

CPT wins

NBU

1.2goals / match

7 goals in 6 meetings

1.17PPG

CPTSlight edge

1.5goals / match

9 goals in 6 meetings

1.67PPG

Match Profile

2.67goals per match

Both teams scored0.5%

Over 2.5 goals0.5%

Clean sheets

0.17%

NBU

0.33%

CPT

H2H Streak

CPT

W-D-L · 2 unbeaten

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

H2H record scale

Dominant record> 1.5 PPG

Strong edge0.8–1.5 PPG

Slight edge0.3–0.8 PPGCPT

Even rivalry< 0.3 PPG

Based on points-per-game gap between teams in head-to-head meetings.

Fallback · neutral · stale

H2H Record

Very high

Recent head-to-heads are evenly split across a small sample.

1.3

goals/match

NBU

1.25 PPG

1-2-1W-D-L4 meetings

1.3

goals/match

CPT

1.25 PPG

H2H sample is small and older than usual.

4 meetings

Detail view (H2HRecordViz)

NBU wins

Draws

CPT wins

NBUEven rivalry

1.3goals / match

5 goals in 4 meetings

1.25PPG

CPT

1.3goals / match

5 goals in 4 meetings

1.25PPG

Match Profile

2.5goals per match

Both teams scored0.5%

Over 2.5 goals0.5%

Clean sheets

0.25%

NBU

0.25%

CPT

H2H Streak

NBU

D-W-D · 2 unbeaten

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

H2H record scale

Dominant record> 1.5 PPG

Strong edge0.8–1.5 PPG

Slight edge0.3–0.8 PPG

Even rivalry< 0.3 PPG

Based on points-per-game gap between teams in head-to-head meetings.

H2H Tactical

h2h_tacticalmatchupH2HTacticalViz

Strong · home · fresh

H2H Tactical

Very high

NBU has consistently dominated possession in head-to-heads.

63.0%

possession

NBU

52.0 DA/match

vs7 matches

37.0%

possession

CPT

28.0 DA/match

Detail view (H2HTacticalViz)

Possession %

63.0%vs37.0%

Dangerous Attacks / Match

52.0vs28.0

Pass Accuracy %

87.0%vs77.0%

Rivalry vs General Form

Notable

How each team's H2H tactical profile differs from their overall form

NBU

Possession+6.0pp

DA / match+10.0

CPT

Possession-6.0pp

DA / match-10.0

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

H2H tactical scale

Clear dominance

Strong advantage

Slight edgeNBU

Even contest

Composite gap from possession, dangerous attacks, and pass accuracy in H2H meetings.

Moderate · away · fresh

H2H Tactical

Very high

CPT edges ahead on possession and pass accuracy in recent head-to-heads.

46.0%

possession

NBU

32.0 DA/match

vs5 matches

54.0%

possession

CPT

39.0 DA/match

Detail view (H2HTacticalViz)

Possession %

46.0%vs54.0%

Dangerous Attacks / Match

32.0vs39.0

Pass Accuracy %

80.0%vs84.0%

Rivalry vs General Form

How each team's H2H tactical profile differs from their overall form

NBU

Possession-2.0pp

DA / match-4.0

CPT

Possession+2.0pp

DA / match+4.0

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

H2H tactical scale

Clear dominance

Strong advantage

Slight edgeCPT

Even contest

Composite gap from possession, dangerous attacks, and pass accuracy in H2H meetings.

Fallback · neutral · stale

H2H Tactical

Very high

Head-to-head tactical profiles are evenly split across a small sample.

50.0%

possession

NBU

35.0 DA/match

vs3 matches

50.0%

possession

CPT

36.0 DA/match

H2H tactical sample is small and older than usual.

Detail view (H2HTacticalViz)

Dangerous Attacks / Match

35.0vs36.0

Possession %

50.0%vs50.0%

Pass Accuracy %

82.0%vs82.0%

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

H2H tactical scale

Clear dominance

Strong advantage

Slight edge

Even contest

Composite gap from possession, dangerous attacks, and pass accuracy in H2H meetings.

H2H Offensive

h2h_offensivematchupH2HOffensiveViz

Strong · home · fresh

H2H Offensive

Very high

NBU has generated substantially more chance volume in head-to-heads.

Detail view (H2HOffensiveViz)

NBU2.05 xG/match

2.05xG / match

0.5% shot accuracy

CPT0.95 xG/match

0.95xG / match

0.3% shot accuracy

xG / Match

2.05vs0.95

Shot Accuracy %

0.5%vs0.3%

Creative Output / Match

2.90

key passes + big chances

0.90

key passes + big chances

Corners / Match

7.4vs3.8

H2H offensive scale

Clear edge> 0.80 xGNBU

Notable edge0.40-0.80

Slight edge0.15-0.40

Even contest< 0.15

Moderate · away · fresh

H2H Offensive

Very high

CPT edges ahead on shot accuracy in recent head-to-heads.

Detail view (H2HOffensiveViz)

NBU1.20 xG/match

1.20xG / match

0.3% shot accuracy

CPT1.40 xG/match

1.40xG / match

0.4% shot accuracy

xG / Match

1.20vs1.40

Shot Accuracy %

0.3%vs0.4%

Creative Output / Match

1.50

key passes + big chances

1.80

key passes + big chances

Corners / Match

5.0vs5.6

H2H offensive scale

Clear edge> 0.80 xG

Notable edge0.40-0.80

Slight edge0.15-0.40CPT

Even contest< 0.15

Fallback · neutral · stale

H2H Offensive

Very high

Head-to-head offensive output is evenly split across a small sample.

H2H offensive sample is small and older than usual.

Detail view (H2HOffensiveViz)

NBU1.25 xG/match

1.25xG / match

0.4% shot accuracy

CPT1.22 xG/match

1.22xG / match

0.4% shot accuracy

xG / Match

1.25vs1.22

Creative Output / Match

1.40

key passes + big chances

1.30

key passes + big chances

Corners / Match

5.2vs5.0

Shot Accuracy %

0.4%vs0.4%

H2H offensive scale

Clear edge> 0.80 xG

Notable edge0.40-0.80

Slight edge0.15-0.40

Even contest< 0.15Current

H2H Defensive

h2h_defensivematchupH2HDefensiveViz

Strong · home · fresh

H2H Defensive

Very high

NBU has conceded substantially fewer high-quality chances in head-to-heads.

0.90

xGA/match

NBU

50% clean sheets

vs10 meetings

1.85

xGA/match

CPT

10% clean sheets

Detail view (H2HDefensiveViz)

NBU0.90 xGA/match

0.90xGA / match

50% clean sheets

CPT1.85 xGA/match

1.85xGA / match

10% clean sheets

xGA / Match (lower = better)

0.90vs1.85

Clean Sheet Rate

50%vs10%

Defensive Actions / Match

0.7vs0.6

Rivalry vs General Form

NBU

-0.20 xGA

Tighter in this fixture

CPT

+0.40 xGA

More exposed in this fixture

Based on 10 meetings (7 with detailed stats)

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

H2H defensive scale

Dominant solidity6+ meetings

Strong edge4+ meetings

Slight advantageNBU

Even contest

xGA, clean sheets, and defensive workload in H2H meetings. Tier capped by sample size.

Moderate · away · fresh

H2H Defensive

Very high

CPT edges ahead on defensive reliability in recent head-to-heads.

1.40

xGA/match

NBU

20% clean sheets

vs6 meetings

1.15

xGA/match

CPT

40% clean sheets

Detail view (H2HDefensiveViz)

NBU1.40 xGA/match

1.40xGA / match

20% clean sheets

CPT1.15 xGA/match

1.15xGA / match

40% clean sheets

xGA / Match (lower = better)

1.40vs1.15

Clean Sheet Rate

20%vs40%

Defensive Actions / Match

0.6vs0.7

Based on 6 meetings (5 with detailed stats)

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

H2H defensive scale

Dominant solidity6+ meetings

Strong edge4+ meetings

Slight advantageCPT

Even contest

xGA, clean sheets, and defensive workload in H2H meetings. Tier capped by sample size.

Fallback · neutral · stale

H2H Defensive

Very high

Head-to-head defensive output is evenly split across a small sample.

1.25

xGA/match

NBU

25% clean sheets

vs4 meetings

1.28

xGA/match

CPT

25% clean sheets

H2H defensive sample is small and older than usual.

Detail view (H2HDefensiveViz)

NBU1.25 xGA/match

1.25xGA / match

25% clean sheets

CPT1.28 xGA/match

1.28xGA / match

25% clean sheets

xGA / Match (lower = better)

1.25vs1.28

Clean Sheet Rate

25%vs25%

Defensive Actions / Match

0.6vs0.6

Based on 4 meetings (3 with detailed stats)

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

H2H defensive scale

Dominant solidity6+ meetings

Strong edge4+ meetings

Slight advantage

Even contest

xGA, clean sheets, and defensive workload in H2H meetings. Tier capped by sample size.

H2H Physical

h2h_physicalmatchupH2HPhysicalViz

Strong · neutral · fresh

H2H Physical

Very high

Recent head-to-heads carry an elevated foul and card volume — heated rivalry.

NBUAerials1%
·Fouls16.4
·Cards3.1

CPTAerials1%
·Fouls15.6
·Cards2.9

Detail view (H2HPhysicalViz)

Aerial Win Rate

0.6%vs0.5%

Fouls / Match

16.4vs15.6

Cards / Match

3.1vs2.9

Low-key fixture

Based on foul rates and card frequency between these teams

Based on 7 meetings with physical stats (10 total)

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

H2H physical scale

Physical dominance

Strong edge

Slight advantageCurrent

Even contest

Composite gap from aerial win rate (55%), fouls (25%), and cards (20%) in H2H meetings.

Moderate · home · fresh

H2H Physical

Very high

NBU edges ahead on aerial duels in recent head-to-heads.

NBUAerials1%
·Fouls12.4
·Cards2.0

CPTAerials0%
·Fouls12.1
·Cards2.1

Detail view (H2HPhysicalViz)

Aerial Win Rate

0.6%vs0.4%

Cards / Match

2.0vs2.1

Fouls / Match

12.4vs12.1

Low-key fixture

Based on foul rates and card frequency between these teams

Based on 5 meetings with physical stats (6 total)

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

H2H physical scale

Physical dominance

Strong edge

Slight advantage

Even contestNBU

Composite gap from aerial win rate (55%), fouls (25%), and cards (20%) in H2H meetings.

Fallback · neutral · stale

H2H Physical

Very high

Head-to-head physical profile is evenly split across a small sample.

NBUAerials1%
·Fouls12.0
·Cards1.9

CPTAerials1%
·Fouls12.2
·Cards2.0

H2H physical sample is small and older than usual.

Detail view (H2HPhysicalViz)

Fouls / Match

12.0vs12.2

Cards / Match

1.9vs2.0

Aerial Win Rate

0.5%vs0.5%

Low-key fixture

Based on foul rates and card frequency between these teams

Based on 3 meetings with physical stats (4 total)

Impact scale (InterpretationScale)

H2H physical scale

Physical dominance

Strong edge

Slight advantage

Even contest

Composite gap from aerial win rate (55%), fouls (25%), and cards (20%) in H2H meetings.

Design review reference

1. Integrated insight (production layout)

Match Information

Northbridge United

Castlepoint FC

Match Balance

Probabilities

Probability Ranges

Value Opportunity

Good Signal

Key Influencing Signals

Data Transparency

No Clear Advantage

2. Signal gallery

Recent Form

NBU

CPT

Scoring Trends

Venue Form

Recent Form

NBU

CPT

Scoring Trends

Venue Form

Recent Form

NBU

CPT

Scoring Trends

Venue Form

Match Dynamic: TACTICAL BATTLE

Northbridge United

Castlepoint FC

Match Dynamic: TACTICAL BATTLE

Northbridge United

Castlepoint FC

Match Dynamic: TACTICAL BATTLE

Northbridge United

Castlepoint FC

Total xG Per Match

Big Chances Per Match

xG Conceded Per Match

Total xG Per Match

Big Chances Per Match

xG Conceded Per Match

Total xG Per Match

Big Chances Per Match

xG Conceded Per Match

Possession

Pass Accuracy

Dangerous Attacks / Match

Possession

Pass Accuracy

Dangerous Attacks / Match

Possession

Pass Accuracy

Dangerous Attacks / Match

EPV (xG per possession)

Shot Accuracy (SoT/Shots)

Pass Accuracy

EPV (xG per possession)

Shot Accuracy (SoT/Shots)

Pass Accuracy

EPV (xG per possession)

Shot Accuracy (SoT/Shots)

Pass Accuracy

STADIUM INFO

HOME RECORD

HOME MATCHES

STADIUM INFO

HOME RECORD

STADIUM INFO

HOME RECORD

RECOVERY TIME

TRAVEL DISTANCE

FIXTURE CONGESTION

RECOVERY TIME

TRAVEL DISTANCE

FIXTURE CONGESTION

RECOVERY TIME

TRAVEL DISTANCE